Research ArticleBiological & Life SciencesOpen Access · CC BY 4.0

Intriguing Biological Perspectives of Actinomycetes from Two Various Commodities

S. Mary Essolin*Muslim Arts College, Thiruvithancode, India
R. S. DhivyaSree Devi Kumari Women's College, Kuzhithurai, India

* Corresponding author

Published in: Vol. 2, No. 1 (2026)Article: 7Pages: 29–30Published: 9 August 2026

Abstract

The actinomycetes from two different marine commodities were isolated, screened, and characterised in the current investigation. Twelve distinct bacterial isolates were obtained and tested using morphological, microscopic, cultural, and biochemical characterisation techniques. The selected bacterial isolates exhibited strong antagonistic activity against pathogens and food spoilage microorganisms. The Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method was used to measure the antagonistic properties of the crude extracts. Isolate AMWM showed good antagonistic activity against the test organisms in comparison with the other isolates and was selected for further study. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to identify the active strains, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of isolate AMWM showed complete homology with Streptomyces lincolnensis. The isolated bioactive metabolites were structurally characterised by FTIR and HPTLC.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Biotechnology in marine environments has led to the discovery of novel microorganisms in marine sediments, including actinomycetes, Gram-positive bacteria with a high G+C content that are significant for organic matter recycling, pharmaceutical production, and vitamin synthesis (Ravenschlag et al., 1999; Stach et al., 2003). Among actinomycetes, Streptomyces species are particularly notable, producing up to 80% of antibiotics (Williams et al., 1984) and contributing to various applications such as disease treatment, biocontrol, industrial enzymes, agrochemicals, and soil fertility (Hamza et al., 2013, 2015). As the largest genus within the Actinobacteria, Streptomyces is also responsible for approximately 70% of antibiotic production (El Hussein et al., 2014).

For precise bacterial identification, genotypic methods such as 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis are preferred over phenotypic methods, especially for rare or novel strains. High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) enhances thin-layer chromatography (TLC) by automating processes and improving resolution and quantitative accuracy, overcoming manual application issues (Morlock et al., 2010). Two-dimensional chromatography further increases analytical capacity by rotating plates with different solvents (Nurok, 1989). Additionally, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy offers a non-invasive, label-free approach to rapidly characterise microbial strains by analysing the content, structure, and chemical modifications of biomolecules (Ami et al., 2013).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Enrichment of Actinomycetes

Isolation of actinomycetes was carried out on Actinomycetes Isolation Agar using the serial dilution method (Nonomura & Ohara, 1969) and the spread plate technique (Collins et al., 1989). All pure colonies of marine actinomycetes were subcultured on agar plates and stored at 4 °C.

2.2. Characterisation of Actinomycete Isolates

2.2.1. Gram Staining

For Gram staining, a smear of the isolate was prepared, air-dried, and heat-fixed. It was then stained with crystal violet, washed with water, treated with iodine, decolourised with alcohol, counterstained with safranin, and washed again with water. Finally, the slide was dried and examined under an oil immersion microscope.

2.2.2. Biochemical Analysis of Actinomycete Isolates

Various biochemical tests were conducted following the guidelines provided in Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (Buchanan & Gibbons, 1974; Holt et al., 2000).

2.3. Antagonistic Activity

The antagonistic activity of actinomycetes against food spoilage bacterial flora was assessed using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method.

2.4. Molecular Characterisation

Molecular characterisation was carried out by 16S rRNA sequencing.

2.5. HPTLC Analysis

HPTLC was used for the chromatography-based purification of the antibacterial compound.

2.6. FTIR Analysis

FTIR spectroscopy was used to identify the functional groups of the bioactive compound.

3. Results and Conclusion

In this work, twelve different actinomycetes were isolated from the marine environment. In the present study, chalky white and grey isolates were noted. Such a dominance of members of the grey series has already been reported in different marine environments (Kim et al., 1998; Ndonde & Semu, 2000; Pridham & Tresner, 1974).

Various biochemical parameters of the Streptomyces isolates were used for their identification (Gottlieb, 1961; Jones & Bradley, 1964; Manfio et al., 2003). The production of citrase, urease, catalase, and oxidase is considered when characterising Streptomyces (Gotoh et al., 1982; Nitsch & Kutzner, 1969). Hydrogen sulphide and melanin production have been regarded as other important characters for the identification of actinomycetes (Shirling & Gottlieb, 1966).

Actinomycetes are a good source of antagonistic activity. The actinomycete isolates were tested for their antagonistic activity against food spoilage microorganisms, namely Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus sp., and Lactobacillus lactis. The isolates showed high antagonistic activity against these food spoilage microorganisms. Apart from these, two biologically active metabolites produced by the actinomycetes were tested against organisms such as Vibrio haemolyticus and Enterococcus sp.

Based on the 16S rRNA analysis, isolate AMWM showed 100% similarity to Streptomyces lincolnensis. Analysis of 16S rRNA began with the amplification of the gene coding for 16S rRNA by the polymerase chain reaction (Hopwood et al., 1985).

HPTLC analysis was used to identify the biologically active metabolites produced by the marine water and marine soil actinomycetes. From marine water, loboporin was detected, while heronamide and desotamide were identified as secondary metabolites from marine soil. FTIR analysis complemented HPTLC by determining the functional groups present in these secondary metabolites.

References

  1. Ami, D., Mereghetti, P., & Doglia, S. M. (2013). Multivariate analysis for Fourier transform infrared spectra of complex biological systems and processes. In L. V. de Freitas & A. P. B. R. de Freitas (Eds.), Multivariate analysis in management, engineering and the sciences. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/53850
  2. Buchanan, R. E., & Gibbons, N. E. (Eds.). (1974). Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology (8th ed.). Williams & Wilkins.
  3. Collins, C. H., Lyne, P. M., & Grange, J. M. (1989). Collins and Lyne's microbiological methods (6th ed.). Butterworths.
  4. El Hussein, A. A., Alhasan, R. E. M., Abdelwahab, S. A., & El Siddig, M. A. (2014). Isolation and identification of Streptomyces rochei strain active against phytopathogenic fungi. British Microbiology Research Journal, 4(10), 1057–1068. https://doi.org/10.9734/bmrj/2014/11074
  5. Gotoh, T., Nakahara, K., Iwami, M., Aoki, H., & Imanaka, H. (1982). Studies on a new immunoactive peptide, FK-156. I. Taxonomy of the producing strains. The Journal of Antibiotics, 35(10), 1280–1285. https://doi.org/10.7164/antibiotics.35.1280
  6. Gottlieb, D. (1961). An evaluation of criteria and procedures used in the description and characterization of the streptomycetes. Applied Microbiology, 9(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1128/am.9.1.55-65.1961
  7. Hamza, A. A., Ali, H. A., & Clark, B. R. (2013). Optimization of fermentation conditions for actinomycin D production by a newly isolated Streptomyces sp. AH 11.4. Journal of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Research, 4(2), 29–34.
  8. Hamza, A. A., Hassan, M. N., & Elyass, M. E. (2015). Isolation and characterization of Streptomyces isolates as a source of bioactive secondary metabolites in Sudan. Journal of Global Biosciences, 4(7), 2649–2661.
  9. Holt, J. G., Krieg, N. R., Sneath, P. H. A., Staley, J. T., & Williams, S. T. (Eds.). (2000). Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology (9th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  10. Hopwood, D. A., Bibb, M. J., Chater, K. F., Kieser, T., Bruton, C. J., Kieser, H. M., Lydiate, D. J., Smith, C. P., Ward, J. M., & Schrempf, H. (1985). Genetic manipulation of Streptomyces: A laboratory manual. John Innes Foundation.
  11. Jones, L. A., & Bradley, S. G. (1964). Phenetic classification of actinomycetes. Developments in Industrial Microbiology, 5, 267–272.
  12. Kim, S. B., Falconer, C., Williams, E., & Goodfellow, M. (1998). Streptomyces thermocarboxydovorans sp. nov. and Streptomyces thermocarboxydus sp. nov., two moderately thermophilic carboxydotrophic species from soil. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 48(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-48-1-59
  13. Manfio, G. P., Atalan, E., Zakrzewska-Czerwinska, J., Mordarski, M., Rodríguez, C., Collins, M. D., & Goodfellow, M. (2003). Classification of novel soil streptomycetes as Streptomyces aureus sp. nov., Streptomyces laceyi sp. nov. and Streptomyces sanglieri sp. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 83(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023332427794
  14. Morlock, G. E., Oellig, C., Bezuidenhout, L. W., Brett, M. J., & Schwack, W. (2010). Miniaturized planar chromatography using office peripherals. Analytical Chemistry, 82(7), 2940–2946. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac902945t
  15. Ndonde, M. J. M., & Semu, E. (2000). Preliminary characterization of some Streptomyces species from four Tanzanian soils and their antimicrobial potential against selected plant and animal pathogenic bacteria. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 16(7), 595–599. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008916418258
  16. Nitsch, B., & Kutzner, H. J. (1969). Egg-yolk agar as a diagnostic medium for streptomycetes. Experientia, 25(2), 220–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01899136
  17. Nonomura, H., & Ohara, Y. (1969). Distribution of actinomycetes in soil: The isolation and classification of the genus Streptosporangium. Journal of Fermentation Technology, 38, 405–409.
  18. Nurok, D. (1989). Strategies for optimizing the mobile phase in planar chromatography. Chemical Reviews, 89(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00092a007
  19. Pridham, T. G., & Tresner, H. D. (1974). Streptomycetaceae. In R. E. Buchanan & N. E. Gibbons (Eds.), Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology (8th ed., p. 747). Williams & Wilkins.
  20. Ravenschlag, K., Sahm, K., Pernthaler, J., & Amann, R. (1999). High bacterial diversity in permanently cold marine sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65(9), 3982–3989. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.9.3982-3989.1999
  21. Shirling, E. B., & Gottlieb, D. (1966). Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 16(3), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-16-3-313
  22. Stach, J. E. M., Maldonado, L. A., Masson, D. G., Ward, A. C., Goodfellow, M., & Bull, A. T. (2003). Statistical approaches for estimating actinobacterial diversity in marine sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(10), 6189–6200. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.10.6189-6200.2003
  23. Williams, S. T., Lanning, S., & Wellington, E. M. H. (1984). Ecology of actinomycetes. In M. Goodfellow, M. Mordarski, & S. T. Williams (Eds.), The biology of the actinomycetes (pp. 481–528). Academic Press.

Related articles

Selected by shared keywords and research domain.

Open Access & Licensing

This is an open access article published by DLCARD and distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licence. You are free to read, download and share it, provided the original work is properly cited.