1. Introduction
Avian diversity, representing the variety of bird species within ecosystems, is a vital component of global biodiversity. With over 10,000 species worldwide, birds play essential roles in ecological balance through activities like scavenging, pollination, and insect predation. India, home to more than 1,300 bird species, harbours 13% of the world’s avian diversity, ranking third globally in terms of the number of threatened and rare species (Dandapat et al., 2010).
Birds, being highly visible and sensitive to environmental changes, serve as excellent indicators of ecosystem health. Environmental factors such as agricultural practices, pollution, and climate change significantly impact bird populations (Mitra et al., 2011). Monitoring avian populations provides crucial data for understanding ecological shifts and developing effective conservation strategies. Given the ongoing destruction of natural habitats, detailed studies on avifauna are essential for their protection and for maintaining ecological balance (Sarkar et al., 2009).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
The study was conducted on the campus of St. Stephen’s College, Pathanapuram, located in the Kollam district of Kerala, India. The campus spans approximately 100 acres within the Pattazhy Vadakkekara Grama Panchayat. This area is characterised by its environmentally rich landscape, which includes the Kallada River situated nearby, as well as diverse vegetation comprising rubber plantations and various tree species such as jungle jack, jackfruit, cashew, and coconut. In accordance with the highland open area, the entire campus was divided into distinct quadrats.
2.2. Bird Survey
The composition and occurrence of birds were systematically documented through direct field visits and observations throughout the study period. The transect method was employed to ensure a standardised approach to recording bird species over time and across different locations. Surveys were conducted monthly, with observations carried out at three distinct sites within the campus. The sites were surveyed in the morning between 08:00 AM and 09:30 AM, a time chosen for its high avian activity.
During each survey, all birds observed or heard were documented. Care was taken to avoid double counting. Observations were made using binoculars (Olympus 8×42 EXWP I) to enhance accuracy. Bird identification was conducted using established field guides and reference books (Ali, 1984; Ali & Ripley, 1983; Grimmett et al., 1999; Manakadan & Pittie, 2001; Neelakantan et al., 1993). Birds were identified to the species level based on physical characteristics, and the number of individuals observed was recorded. The census was conducted over a two-month period, from February 2021 to March 2021, with surveys performed fortnightly. The species were classified by habitat into wetland birds and terrestrial birds, and by status into resident (R), migrant (M), and local migrant (LM).
3. Results and Discussion
A comprehensive avifaunal survey was conducted on the St. Stephen’s College campus, Kollam, during the period from February to March 2021. The study identified a total of 15 bird species, distributed across 13 families and 6 orders (Table 1). The orders documented were Columbiformes (1 sp.), Psittaciformes (1 sp.), Cuculiformes (1 sp.), Coraciiformes (2 spp.), Piciformes (2 spp.), and Passeriformes (8 spp.). The month of February recorded the highest species diversity, with 11 species documented, while March recorded 10 species, including one wetland species.
The majority of the bird species identified were residents, comprising 13 species (98%), while one species was classified as a local migrant (1%) and another as a migrant (1%). Among the resident species, the House Crow was the most prevalent. Notably, the Asian Paradise Flycatcher was the sole migrant species observed during this study, and the Black-hooded Oriole was the only local migrant recorded. The White-throated Kingfisher was the only wetland-associated species observed. The conservation status of the species documented revealed that five species had not been assessed by the IUCN, while ten species were classified as Least Concern, including the Blue Rock Pigeon, Asian Koel, Indian Treepie, Pale-billed Flowerpecker, Yellow-billed Babbler, and Asian Paradise Flycatcher (Table 2).
The Shannon diversity index showed a value of 1.96. This value suggests a moderate diversity in the bird community. The value of Pielou’s evenness index is 0.72. Here, the value indicates a fairly even distribution, though some species are more abundant than others. Similarly, the value of Margalef’s richness index is 3.10. In this case, the value suggests a reasonably rich bird community, given the number of individuals observed. The Berger–Parker dominance index is 0.37. The Berger–Parker index shows that the higher the species dominance, the lower the diversity. The Berger–Parker index reflects the dominance of the most abundant species. A lower value would indicate a more even distribution, while a higher value indicates that a few species dominate. Here, the House Crow is the most dominant species, making up 37% of the total bird population.
The structure of vegetation plays a pivotal role in shaping the avian community at a given location. Areas with more complex vegetation structures tend to harbour higher species diversity. The diversity observed among terrestrial birds can be attributed to the variety of habitats and microhabitats within roadside plantations, bamboo groves, mango orchards, and narrow forested areas (Harisha & Hosetti, 2009).
The St. Stephen’s College campus exhibited significant species richness, indicating that the area is capable of sustaining a diverse array of bird species by offering adequate food resources and shelter (Lakshmi, 2006). Birds inhabit various environments and depend on a complex network of microhabitats for their survival. The presence of paddy fields near the campus is particularly beneficial, attracting a larger variety of bird species. The findings of this study align with those of previous research on wetland birds in the Chhilchhila Wildlife Sanctuary, where paddy fields with scattered trees were found to provide protection and suitable foraging areas for birds (Kumar & Gupta, 2013). The habitat of the college campus offers a variety of food sources, including invertebrates, fish, and plankton, which likely contribute to the increased diversity of avian species. These findings are consistent with observations made by Basavarajappa (2006). The absence of Black Kites (Milvus migrans) in the study area suggests a relatively unpolluted environment. The high number of resident birds documented during the present study may indicate that the ecosystem experiences minimal disturbance. Furthermore, bird diversity is observed to be greater in February, which may be linked to the seasonal effects of winter. The diversity indices indicate that the bird community on the St. Stephen’s College campus is moderately diverse with a fair level of evenness. While there is a relatively high species richness, the dominance of the House Crow (Corvus splendens) is notable, as it accounts for a significant portion of the total bird population. This dominance slightly reduces the overall evenness and diversity of the community.
Understanding the diversity of bird species is imperative for conservation efforts, as it provides critical insights into ecosystem health. The present study enhances the understanding of the interactions between bird species and their environments, revealing the importance of biodiversity conservation.
| Sl. No. | Order/Family | Scientific Name | Common Name | Number of Birds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb. | Mar. | Total | ||||
| 1 | Columbiformes Columbidae | Columba livia | Blue Rock Pigeon | 12 | 9 | 21 |
| 2 | Psittaciformes Psittacidae | Psittacula krameri manillensis | Rose-ringed Parakeet | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 3 | Cuculiformes Cuculidae | Eudynamys scolopaceus | Asian Koel | – | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | Coraciiformes Centropodidae | Upupa epops | Greater Coucal | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Alcedinidae | Halcyon smyrnensis | White-throated Kingfisher | – | 1 | 1 | |
| 5 | Piciformes Megalaimidae | Megalaima viridis | White-cheeked Barbet | 1 | – | 1 |
| Picidae | Dinopium benghalense tehminae | Woodpecker | 2 | – | 2 | |
| 6 | Passeriformes Oriolidae | Oriolus xanthornus | Black-hooded Oriole | 1 | – | 1 |
| Dicruridae | Dicrurus macrocercus | Black Drongo | 3 | – | 3 | |
| Sturnidae | Acridotheres tristis | Common Myna | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Corvidae | Corvus splendens | House Crow | 15 | 19 | 34 | |
| Dendrocitta vagabunda | Indian Treepie | – | 2 | 2 | ||
| Dicaeidae | Dicaeum erythrorhynchos | Pale-billed Flowerpecker | 2 | – | 2 | |
| Muscicapidae | Turdoides affinis | Yellow-billed Babbler | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Terpsiphone paradisi | Asian Paradise Flycatcher | – | 1 | 1 | ||
| Sl. No. | Common Name | Status | Habitat | Conservation Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blue Rock Pigeon | R | T | NA |
| 2 | Rose-ringed Parakeet | R | T | LC |
| 3 | Asian Koel | R | T | NA |
| 4 | Greater Coucal | R | T | LC |
| 5 | White-throated Kingfisher | R | W | LC |
| 6 | White-cheeked Barbet | R | T | LC |
| 7 | Woodpecker | R | T | LC |
| 8 | Black-hooded Oriole | LM | T | LC |
| 9 | Black Drongo | R | T | LC |
| 10 | Common Myna | R | T | LC |
| 11 | House Crow | R | T | LC |
| 12 | Indian Treepie | R | T | NA |
| 13 | Pale-billed Flowerpecker | R | T | NA |
| 14 | Yellow-billed Babbler | R | T | NA |
| 15 | Asian Paradise Flycatcher | M | T | LC |
Status: R, resident; M, migrant; LM, local migrant.
Habitat: W, wetland bird; T, wetland-associated terrestrial bird.
Conservation status: LC, Least Concern; NA, Not Assessed.
4. Conclusion
The present study underscores the campus’s success in attracting a wide variety of avian species. The findings reveal that the distribution and relative abundance of these birds are intricately connected to factors such as aquatic vegetation, prey availability, and foraging success. Given the vital role birds play in nature, the study emphasises the importance of avian conservation, particularly in light of the extensive landscape changes occurring in Kerala’s lowlands due to population growth, tourism, and development. The relatively undisturbed ecosystem of the St. Stephen’s College campus presents a valuable setting for conservation initiatives. Active engagement with the campus management is essential to raise awareness about the significance of wetlands and bird species, ensuring the long-term preservation of the area’s ecological diversity.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the authorities of St. Stephen’s College, Pathanapuram, University of Kerala, for providing all the infrastructure and facilities for the successful completion of the present research work.
References
- Ali, S. (1984). Birds of Kerala. Oxford University Press.
- Ali, S., & Ripley, S. D. (1983). A pictorial guide to the birds of the Indian subcontinent. Bombay Natural History Society; Oxford University Press.
- Basavarajappa, S. (2006). Avifauna of agro-ecosystems of Maidan area of Karnataka. Zoos’ Print Journal, 21(4), 2217–2219. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.zpj.1277.2217-9
- Dandapat, A., Banerjee, D., & Chakraborty, D. (2010). The case of the disappearing house sparrow (Passer domesticus indicus). Veterinary World, 3(2), 97–100. https://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.3/February/The%20case%20of%20the%20Disappearing%20House%20Sparrow.pdf
- Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C., & Inskipp, T. (1999). Pocket guide to the birds of the Indian subcontinent. Oxford University Press.
- Harisha, M. N., & Hosetti, B. B. (2009). Diversity and distribution of avifauna of Lakkavalli range forest, Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghat, India. Ecoprint: An International Journal of Ecology, 16, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.3126/eco.v16i0.3469
- Kumar, P., & Gupta, S. K. (2013). Status of wetland birds of Chhilchhila Wildlife Sanctuary, Haryana, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 5(5), 3969–3976. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.o3158.3969-76
- Lakshmi, B. B. (2006). Avifauna of Gosthani estuary near Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18(2), 291–304.
- Manakadan, R., & Pittie, A. (2001). Standardised common and scientific names of the birds of the Indian subcontinent. Buceros, 6(1), 1–37.
- Mitra, A., Chatterjee, C., & Mandal, F. B. (2011). Synthetic chemical pesticides and their effects on birds. Research Journal of Environmental Toxicology, 5(2), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjet.2011.81.96
- Neelakantan, K. K., Sashikumar, C., & Venugopalan, R. (1993). A book of Kerala birds (Part 1). World Wide Fund for Nature-India, Kerala State Committee.
- Sarkar, N. J., Sultana, D., Jaman, M. F., & Rahman, M. K. (2009). Diversity and population of avifauna of two urban sites in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Ecoprint: An International Journal of Ecology, 16, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3126/eco.v16i0.3464